Q1 Length of the report - Is the length of the report the most (inadequate/adequate) with respect to its content?
Q2 Explanation quality - Regarding with the truthfulness of the data, are you (unidentified/identified) with the way of describing the results? Are they supported by adequate evidence?
Q3 Relevance of content - Do you (disagree/agree) that the content of the report is relevant with the problem of deforestation of Amazon?
Q4 Identification with the expressed results - Regarding with the relevance of the data (reported in the table), are you (unidentified/identified) with the way of describing the results?
Q5 Understandable format - Is the format of the report, including the use of punctuation, the most (inadequate/adequate)? Is it avoiding ambiguity?
Q6 Ordered text - Are the ideas (incorrectly/correctly) ordered to facilitate the comprehension of the report?
Q7 Correct use of vocabulary - Regarding with the clarity of the report; is the language (incorrectly/correctly) used?